Comparing reflection capabilities of C++, Zig and C3

The article compares the reflection capabilities of C++, Zig, and C3 programming languages. The author of the blog post, Nyr, provides a detailed comparison of the reflection features of each language, including their pros and cons. The comparison includes information on the type of reflection available, the ease of use, and the performance impact of reflection in each language. C++ is found to have a wide range of reflection capabilities, including RTTI and C++20 concepts, but it also has a steeper learning curve and performance overhead. Zig is found to have limited reflection capabilities, but is easier to use and has less performance overhead. C3 is found to have limited reflection capabilities, but is designed for use in embedded systems and has a small code size. The author concludes that the choice of language for reflection depends on the specific needs of the project.